Trust in Institutions impacting distress symptoms in times of Covid-19: the Brazilian Case

Autores

  • Juliano Domingues Silva Universidade Estadual de Maringá
  • Maurício Reinert do Nascimento Universidade Estadual de Maringá
  • Fabiane Cortez Verdu Universidade Estadual de Maringá
  • Claudia Cristina Macceo Sato Universidade Federal de Roraima

Palavras-chave:

Trust, Institutions, Distress Symptoms, Covid-19

Resumo

Este artigo fornece uma análise retrospectiva do impacto da confiança em instituições no Brasil durante a onda inicial da Covid-19 sobre os sintomas de angústia. Capturando dados de 571 entrevistados de todas as cinco regiões brasileiras durante o período crucial de abril-maio de 2021, o estudo examina a relação entre a confiança institucional e os resultados de saúde pública no início da pandemia. Nossos achados revelam quatro grupos distintos baseados na confiança, refletindo a natureza multifacetada da confiança em meio à crise política e de desinformação da época. Notavelmente, nossos dados contradizem a norma esperada: o grupo com menor confiança em instituições relatou menos sintomas de angústia, um paradoxo possivelmente enraizado em uma atitude negacionista ligada a sentimentos anti-establishment e à crise de desinformação. Em um contexto contemporâneo, este estudo fornece insights históricos sobre a dinâmica dos primeiros dias da pandemia e também oferece um ponto de reflexão para entender as implicações de longo prazo da confiança institucional na saúde pública, especialmente em tempos de crise.

Biografia do Autor

Juliano Domingues Silva, Universidade Estadual de Maringá

Professor Adjunto do Departamento de Administração da Universidade Estadual de Maringá

Referências

Alsan, M., & Wanamaker, M. (2018). Tuskegee and the health of black men. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133, 407–455.

Arbelaitz, O., Gurrutxaga, I., Muguerza, J., Pérez, J. M., & Perona, I. (2013). An extensive comparative study of cluster validity indices. Pattern Recognition, 46(1), 243-256.

Banda, K. K., & Kirkland, J. H. (2017). Legislative party polarization and trust in states legislatures. American Politics Research, 46(4), 596-628.

Ballada, C. J. A., Aruta, J. J. B. R., Callueng, C. M., Antazo, B. G., Kimhi, S., Reinert, M., ... & Verdu, F. C. (2022). Bouncing back from COVID‐19: Individual and ecological factors influence national resilience in adults from Israel, the Philippines, and Brazil. Journal of Ccommunity & Applied Social Psychology, 32(3), 452-475.

Bargain, O., & Aminjonov, U. (2020). Trust and compliance to public health policies in times of COVID-19. Journal of Public Economics, 192, 104316.

Bavel, J. J. V., & Pereira, A. (2018). The partisan brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(3), 213-224.

Bavel, J. J. V., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., ... & Druckman, J. N. (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), 460-471.

Bergkvist, L. I., & Rossiter, J. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 175-184.

Bish, A., & Michie, S. (2010). Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: A review. British Journal of Health Psychology, 15(4), 797-824.

Blair, R. A., Morse, B. S., & Tsai, L. L. (2017). Public health and public trust. Social Science & Medicine, 172, 89–97.

Burki, T. (2020). COVID-19 in Latin America. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 20(5), 547-548.

Clarke, S. P., Oades, L. G., Crowe, T. P., Caputi, P., & Deane, F. P. (2009). The role of symptom distress and goal attainment in promoting aspects of psychological recovery for consumers with enduring mental illness. Journal of Mental Health, 18(5), 389-397.

Derogatis, L. R., & Savitz, K. L. (2000). The SCL-90-R and Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) in primary care. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), Handbook of Psychological Assessment in Primary Care Settings (pp. 297–334). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Frewer, L. J. (2004). The public and effective risk communication. Toxicology Letters, 149(1-3), 391-397.

Garrett, L. (2020). COVID-19: the medium is the message. The Lancet, 395(10228), 942-943.

Hetherington, M. J. (2005). Why trust matters: Declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. Princeton University Press.

Humphreys, A., & Thompson, C. J. (2014). Branding disaster. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4), 877-910.

Khemani, S. (2020). An Opportunity to Build Legitimacy and Trust in Public Institutions in the Time of COVID-19. Research & Policy Briefs, 32, 1-5.

Kimhi, S., Eshel, Y., Adini, B., Aruta, J. J. B. R., Antazo, B. G., Briones-Diato, A., ... & Marciano, H. (2021). Distress and resilience in days of COVID-19: international study of samples from Israel, Brazil, and the Philippines. Cross-Cultural Research, 55(5), 415-437.

Kimhi, S., Eshel, Y., Leykin, D., & Lahad, M. (2017). Individual, community, and national resilience in peacetime and the face of terror. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 22(8), 698–713.

Kimhi, S., Eshel, Y., Marciano, H., & Adini, B. (2020). Distress and resilience in the days of COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), 3956.

Kozinets, R. V., Gershoff, A. D., & White, T. B. (2020). Trust in Doubt: Consuming in a Post-Truth World. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 5(2), 130-136.

Kwon, M., & Barone, M. J. (2020). A world of mistrust. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 5(2), 206-219.

Lancet. (2020). COVID-19 in Brazil: "So what?". Lancet, 395(10235), 1461.

Lazer, D., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., ... & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094-1096.

Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 475-507.

Luhmann, N. (2017). Trust and power. Polity.

Machado, J., & Miskolci, R. (2019). Das jornadas de junho à cruzada moral. Sociologia & Antropologia, 9(3), 945-970.

Matos, O. V. H., & Formetin, C. N. (2016). Veja e Carta Capital. Revista Digital Em Debate, 16, 15-40.

Meyer, S. B., & Ward, P. R. (2013). Differentiating between trust and dependence of patients with coronary heart disease: Furthering the sociology of trust. Health, Risk & Society, 15(3), 279-293.

Mignozzetti, U., & Spektor, M. (2019). Brazil: when political oligarchies limit polarization but fuel populism. In T. Carothers & A. O’Donohue (Eds.), Democracies divided (pp. 331-374). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

Morse, B., Grépin, K. A., Blair, R. A., & Tsai, L. (2016). Patterns of demand for non-Ebola health services during and after the Ebola outbreak. BMJ Global Health, 1, 1-8.

Nuttavuthisit, K., & Thøgersen, J. (2017). The importance of consumer trust for the emergence of a market for green products. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(2), 323-337.

Pereira, C., & Teles, V. (2019). Political and institutional perils of Brazil’s COVID-19 crisis. Lancet, 396(10248), 367-368.

Quinn, S. C. (2008). Crisis and emergency risk communication in a pandemic: A model for building capacity and resilience of minority communities. Health Promotion Practice, 9(4_suppl), 18S-25S.

Sevcenko, N. (2018). A revolta da vacina. São Paulo: Editora Unesp.

Siegrist, M., & Zingg, A. (2014). The role of public trust during pandemics: Implications for crisis communication. European Psychologist, 19(1), 23-32.

Solomon, Z., & Prager, E. (1992). Elderly Israeli Holocaust survivors during the Persian Gulf War. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 149(12), 1707-1710.

Sott, M. K., Bender, M. S., & da Silva Baum, K. (2022). COVID-19 outbreak in Brazil: health, social, political, and economic implications. International Journal of Health Services, 52(4), 442-454.

Van der Weerd, W., Timmermans, D. R., Beaujean, D. J., Oudhoff, J., & van Steenbergen, J. E. (2011). Monitoring the level of government trust, risk perception and intention of the public to adopt protective measures during the influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in The Netherlands. BMC Public Health, 11, 575.

Van Prooijen, J. W., & Douglas, K. M. (2017). Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies, 10(3), 323-333.

Vinck, P., Pham, P. N., Bindu, K. K., Bedford, J., & Nilles, E. J. (2019). Institutional trust and misinformation in the response to the 2018-19 Ebola outbreak in North Kivu, DR Congo. Lancet Infectious Diseases, 19, 529–536.

WHO (2020). Brazil. Retrieved from: https://covid19.who.int/region/amro/country/br

Downloads

Publicado

19/04/24

Edição

Seção

Artigos