AFINAL, AVANÇAMOS OU INTERROMPEMOS AS INVESTIGAÇÕES SOBRE O FENÔMENO ABELHA RAINHA?

Autores

  • Manoel Bastos Gomes Neto Pontifícia Universidade Católica - Minas Gerais (PUC-MG)
  • Rebeca da Rocha Grangeiro Universidade Federal do Cariri

Palavras-chave:

Fenômeno Queen Bee, Ameaça de Gênero, Organizações masculinizadas, Relação Entre Mulheres

Resumo

O presente estudo busca identificar e analisar de modo sistemático a produção científica sobre Fenômeno Abelha Rainha (FAR). Foram identificados 60 trabalhos que abordam a metáfora, disponibilizados em seis bases de dados. A produção científica foi analisada com base em técnicas bibliométricas, análises quantitativas e de conteúdo. Nota-se que os estudos estão concentrados entre países, autores, instituições e periódicos europeus ou da América do Norte. Os achados apontam amadurecimento dos estudos que deslocaram a responsabilidade pelo fenômeno da mulher para as organizações masculinas, oportunidades limitadas e experiências de discriminação. As discussões apresentadas são úteis a pesquisadores(as) que estudam gênero e às organizações, pois remetem à cultura, políticas e práticas pouco acolhedoras às mulheres e suas ambições profissionais. Apesar do uso frequente do título Abelha Rainha com o intuito de desabonar a imagem das mulheres, sugerimos ampliação dos estudos sobre o fenômeno dadas as lacunas encontradas.

Biografia do Autor

Manoel Bastos Gomes Neto, Pontifícia Universidade Católica - Minas Gerais (PUC-MG)

Mestrando em Administração pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica - Minas Gerais (PUC-MG). Graduado em Administração pela Universidade Federal do Cariri (UFCA/2021). Técnico em Finanças pela Escola Estadual de Educação Profissionalizante Raimundo Saraiva Coelho (EEEP-RSC/2016). Membro do Núcleo de Estudos em Recursos Humanos e Relações de Trabalho (NERHURT/PUC-MG) e do Laboratório Interdisciplinar de Estudos em Gestão Social (LIEGS/UFCA), ambos certificados pelo CNPq.

Rebeca da Rocha Grangeiro, Universidade Federal do Cariri

Possui graduação em Psicologia pela Universidade Federal do Ceará (2002), mestrado em Psicologia pela Universidade Federal da Bahia (2006), doutorado em Psicologia pela Universidade Federal da Bahia (2015) e estágio doutoral em Psicologia - Université Paris Descartes (2014). Laureada do ?Scholarship Programme for Young Professors and Researchers from Latin American Universities - Coimbra Group Universities? com pesquisa na Universidade de Poitiers (França). Professora Adjunta IV do Centro de Ciências Sociais Aplicadas da Universidade Federal do Cariri (CCSA/UFCA). Pesquisadora vinculada ao Laboratório Interdisciplinar de Estudos em Gestão Social (Liegs/UFCA). Em mobilidade para realização de Pós-Doutorado na Universidade de Poitiers.

Referências

Abalkhail, J. M. (2020). Women managing women: hierarchical relationships and career impact. Career Development International. doi: 10.1108/CDI-01-2019-0020

Abramson, J. 1975. The invincible woman: Discrimination in the academic profession. London: Jossey-Bass.

Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & society, 4(2), 139-158. doi: 10.1177/089124390004002002

American Psychological Association (2019). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, Seventh Edition (2020).

Arvate, P. R., Galilea, G. W., & Todescat, I. (2018). The queen bee: A myth? The effect of top-level female leadership on subordinate females. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 533-548. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.03.002

Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo: Almedina.

Cooper, V. W. (1997). Homophily or the queen bee syndrome: Female evaluation of female leadership. Small Group Research, 28(4), 483-499. doi: 10.1177/1046496497284001

Corwin, E. S., Loncarich, H., & Ridge, J. W. (2021). What’s It Like Inside the Hive? Managerial Discretion Drives TMT Gender Diversity of Women-Led Firms. Journal of Management. Doi: 10.1177/01492063211011755

Derks, B., Ellemers, N., Van Laar, C., & Groot, K. (2011a). Do sexist organizational cultures create the Queen Bee?. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 519-535. doi: 10.1348/014466610X525280

Derks, B., Van Laar, C., Ellemers, N., & Groot, K. (2011b). Gender-bias primes elicit queen bee responses among senior policewomen. Psychological Science, 22, 1243-1249. doi: 10.1177/0956797611417258

Derks, B., Van Laar, C., & Ellemers, N. (2016). The queen bee phenomenon: Why women leaders distance themselves from junior women. The Leadership Quarterly, 27, 456- 469. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.12.007

Derks, B., Van Laar, C., Ellemers, N., & Raghoe, G. (2015). Extending the queen bee effect: How Hindustani workers cope with disadvantage by distancing the self from the group. Journal of Social Issues, 71, 476-496. doi: 10.1111/josi.12124

Diehl, A. B., Stephenson, A. L., Dzubinski, L. M., & Wang, D. C. (2020). Measuring the invisible: Development and multi‐industry validation of the Gender Bias Scale for Women Leaders. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 31(3), 249-280. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.21389

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Dusch, M. N., Braun, H. J., O’Sullivan, P. S., & Ascher, N. L. (2014). Perceptions of surgeons: what characteristics do women surgeons prefer in a colleague?. The American Journal of Surgery, 208(4), 601-604. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.06.005

Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573. doi: 10.1037//0033-295X.109.3.573

Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The leadership quarterly, 14(6), 807-834. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.004

Ellemers, N. (2014). Women at Work: How Organizational Features Impact Career Development. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1 (1), 46-54. doi: 10.1177/2372732214549327

Ellemers, N., Rink, F., Derks, B., & Ryan, M. K. (2012). Women in high places: When and why promoting women into top positions can harm them individually or as a group (and how to prevent this). Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 163-187. doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2012.10.003

Ellemers, N., Van den Heuvel, H., De Gilder, D., Maass, A., & Bonvini, A. (2004). The underrepresentation of women in science: differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome?. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43(3), 315-338. doi: 10.1348/0144666042037999

Evtushenko, A., & Gastner, M. T. (2020). Beyond Fortune 500: Women in a Global Network of Directors. In International Conference on Complex Networks and Their Applications (pp. 586-598). Springer, Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-36683-4_47

Faniko, K., Ellemers, N., & Derks, B. (2016). Queen Bees and Alpha Males: Are successful women more competitive than successful men?. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(7), 903-913. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2198

Faniko, K., Ellemers, N., Derks, B., & Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (2017a). Quota women are threatening to men: Unveiling the (counter) stereotypization of beneficiaries of affirmative action policies. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 76, 107. doi: 10.1024/1421- 0185/a000195

Faniko, K., Ellemers, N., Derks, B., & Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (2017b). Nothing changes, really: Why women who break through the glass ceiling end up reinforcing it. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(5), 638-651. doi: 10.1177%2F0146167217695551

Faniko, K., Ellemers, N., & Derks, B. (2021). The Queen Bee phenomenon in Academia 15 years after: Does it still exist, and if so, why?. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(2), 383-399. doi: 10.1111/bjso.124084

Grangeiro, R. R., Silva, L. E. N., & Esnard, C. (2021). I broke the glass ceiling, now what? Overview of metaphors to explain gender inequality in organizations. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. v. ahead-of-print, p. 638-651. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-07-2020-2281

Hekman, D. R., Johnson, S. K., Foo, M. D., & Yang, W. (2017). Does diversity-valuing behavior result in diminished performance ratings for non-white and female leaders?. Academy of Management Journal, 60(2), 771-797. doi: 10.5465/amj.2014.0538

Johnson, Z., & Mathur-Helm, B. (2011). Experiences with queen bees: A South African study exploring the reluctance of women executives to promote other women in the workplace. South African Journal of Business Management, 42(4), 47-55. doi: 10.4102/sajbm.v42i4.504.

Longwe, S. H. (1998). Education for women’s empowerment or schooling for women’s subordination?. Gender & development, 6(2), 19-26. doi: 10.1080/741922726

Khazan, O. (2017). Why do women bully each other at work? Research suggests that conditions in the workplace might be to blame. The Atlantic.

Klerk, S., & Verreynne, M. L. (2017). The networking practices of women managers in an emerging economy setting: negotiating institutional and social barriers. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(3), 477-501. doi: 10.1111/1748-8583.12151

Lössbroek, J., & Radl, J. (2019). Teaching older workers new tricks: workplace practices and gender training differences in nine European countries. Ageing & Society, 39(10), 2170-2193. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X1800079X

Lyngsie, J., & Foss, N. J. (2017). The more, the merrier? Women in top‐management teams and entrepreneurship in established firms. Strategic Management Journal, 38(3), 487-505.doi: 10.1002/smj.2510

Mayer, S. J., & Rathmann, J. M. (2018). How does research productivity relate to gender? Analyzing gender differences for multiple publication dimensions. Scientometrics, 117(3), 1663-1693. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2933-1

Mavin, S. (2006). Venus envy: problematizing solidarity behaviour and queen bees. Women in Management Review, 21, 264-276. doi: 10.1108/09649420610666579

Mavin, S. (2006b). Venus envy 2: Sisterhood, queen bees and female misogyny in management. Women in Management Review, 21, 5, 349-364. doi: 10.1108/09649420610676172

Mavin, S. (2008). Queen bees, wannabees and afraid to bees: no more ‘best enemies’ for women in management?. British Journal of Management, 19, S75-S84. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00573.x

Míltersteíner, R. K., De Olíveíra, F. B., Hryníewícz, L. G. C., Sant’anna, A. D. S., & Moura, L. C. (2020). Female leadership: perceptions, reflections, and challenges in public administration. Cadernos EBAPE. BR, 18(2), 406-423. doi: 10.1111 / j.1467-8551.2008.00573.x

O’Neil, D. A., Brooks, M. E., & Hopkins, M. M. (2018). Women’s roles in women’s career advancement: what do women expect of each other?. Career Development International. 23 (3), 327-344. doi: 10.1108/CDI-10-2017-0196

O’Neil, D. A., Hopkins, M. M., & Bilimoria, D. (2008). Women’s careers at the start of the 21st century: Patterns and paradoxes. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(4), 727-743. doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9465-6

Paul, J., & Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know?. International Business Review, 29(4), 101717. doi: 10.1016 / j.ibusrev.2020.101717

Paustian‐Underdahl, S. C., King, E. B., Rogelberg, S. G., Kulich, C., & Gentry, W. A. (2017). Perceptions of supervisor support: Resolving paradoxical patterns across gender and race. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 90(3), 436-457. doi: 10.1111/joop.12179

Post, C., Sarala, R., Gatrell, C., & Prescott, J. E. (2020). Advancing theory with review articles. Journal of Management Studies, 57(2), 351-376. doi: 10.1111/joms.12549

Rindfleish, J. (2000). Senior management women in Australia: diverse perspectives. Women in Management Review. 15 (4), 172-180. doi: 10.1108/09649420010335491

Sengul, H., Cinar, F., & Bulut, A. (2019). The perception of queen bee phenomenon in nurses; qualitative study in health sector. Nigerian journal of clinical practice, 22(7), 906.

Sheppard, L. D., & Aquino, K. (2013). Much ado about nothing? Observers’ problematization of women’s same-sex conflict at work. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(1), 52-62. doi: 10.5465/amp.2012.0005

Sheppard, L. D., & Aquino, K. (2017). Sisters at arms: A theory of female same-sex conflict and its problematization in organizations. Journal of Management, 43(3), 691-715. doi: 10.1177/0149206314539348

Sieweke, J., & Santoni, S. (2020). Natural experiments in leadership research: An introduction, review, and guidelines. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), 101338. doi: 10.17632/p3wf75ngkk.1

Staines, G., Tavris, C., & Jayaratne, T. E. (1974). The queen bee syndrome. Psychology Today, 7 (8), 55–60. doi: 10.1037/e400562009-003

Sterk, N., Meeussen, L., & Van Laar, C. (2018). Perpetuating inequality: junior women do not see queen bee behavior as negative but are nonetheless negatively affected by it. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1690. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01690

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British journal of management, 14(3), 207-222. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.00375

Vial, A. C., & Napier, J. L. (2017). High power mindsets reduce gender identification and benevolent sexism among women (but not men). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 162-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.06.012

Vial, A. C., Napier, J. L., & Brescoll, V. L. (2016). A bed of thorns: Female leaders and the self-reinforcing cycle of illegitimacy. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 400-414. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.12.004

Webber, G. R., & Giuffre, P. (2019). Women’s relationships with women at work: Barriers to solidarity. Sociology Compass, 13(6), 1-13, e12698. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12698

Downloads

Publicado

29/12/22