M-LEARNING ADOPTION: COMPARING ADOPTERS AND NON-ADOPTERS INSTRUCTORS
Palavras-chave:
m-learning, mobile learning, higher education, instructors, innovationResumo
This paper investigates higher education instructors’ attitude towards mobile learning (m-learning), focusing
on the motives behind their decision to adopt m-learning in their daily activities. Supported by the diffusion of
innovations theory, the researchers interviewed both instructors who had already adopted m-learning and instructors
who had not. Data from the interviews were subjected to content analysis and results suggest that, no
matters the difference in perception between adopters and non-adopters, there are three fundamental pillars
that allow for innovation in teaching practices: (1) the instructor’s personal interest in innovating and changing
those practices, (2) institutional support, and (3) government support.
Referências
AKOUR, H. Determinants of mobile learning acceptance: an empirical investigation in higher education. PhD. Dissertation: Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma. p. 1-363, 2009.
BARDIN, L. Análise de Conteúdo. 3a reimp. 1.ed. Lisboa: Edições 70, 2011.
BOWEN, G. Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note. Qualitative Research, v.8, n.1, p.137-152, 2008.
CAPRETZ, L.; ALRASHEEDI, M. A Meta-Analysis of Critical Success Factors Affecting Mobile learning. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment and Learning for Engineering (TALE), Bali, ANAIS… paper 18, p. 262, 2013.
CRESWELL, J. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th Edition. London, UK: SAGE Publications, 2013.
CHRISTENSEN, C.; MICHAEL, B.; JOHNSON, C. Disrupting Class: How Disruptive Innovation Will Change the Way the World Learns. 1st Ed. New York, USA, 2012.
McGraw-Hill.
FERREIRA, J. B.; KLEIN, A. Z.; FREITAS, A.; SCHLEMMER, E. Mobile Learning: Definition, Uses and Challenges, in Laura A. Wankel, Patrick Blessinger (ed.) Increasing Student Engagement and Retention Using Mobile Applications: Smartphones, Skype and Texting Technologies (Cutting-edge Technologies in Higher Education), v.6, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, p.47-82, 2013
FREITAS, A. S.; BANDEIRA-DE-MELLO, R. Managerial action and sensemaking in e- implementation in Brazilian business schools. Computers & Education, v.59, n.4, p.1.286-1.299, 2012.
GLASER, B.; STRAUSS, A. The discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies For qualitative research. New Brunswick and London: Aldine Transaction 1967.
IBGE. Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domincílios. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, 2015. Available in < http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/pesquisas/pesquisa_resultados.php?id_pesquisa=40> Retrieve Oct, 15th, 2015.
KAPOOR, K.; DWIVEDI, Y.; WILLIAMS, M. Innovation adoption attributes: a review and synthesis of research findings, European Journal of Innovation Management, v.17, n.3, p.327-348, 2014.
KEARNEY, M.; BURDEN, K.; RAI, T. Investigating instructors' adoption of signature mobile pedagogies. Computers & Education, v.80, Issue C, 48-57, 2015.
KOC, M. Student instructors' conceptions of technology: A metaphor analysis. Computers & Education, v.68, October, p.1-8, 2013.
KUKULSKA-HULME, A.; SHARPLES, M.; MILRAD, M.; ARNEDILLO-SANCHEZ, I.; VAVOULA, G. The genesis and development of mobile learning in Europe. In D. Parsons (Ed.), Combining E-learning and M-learningM-learning: New Applications of Blended Educational Resources. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, p.151-177, 2011
KURTZ, R.; PINA. F.; FERREIRA, J.; SILVA, J.; FREITAS, A.; GIOVANNINI, C. Adoção de m-learning por professores no ensino superior: uma investigação sobre aspectos favoráveis e possíveis barreiras. In: XXXVIII Encontro da ANPAD, 2014, Rio de Janeiro. Anais do XXXVIII Encontro da ANPAD, 2014.
LEFOE, G.; OLNEY, I.; WRIGHT, R.; HERRINGTON, A. Faculty development for new technologies: Putting mobile learning in the hands of the instructors. Faculty of Education-Papers, 77, 2009.
LITTLEJOHN, A.; MARGARYAN, A.; GLASGOW, G. Exploring students’ use of ICT and expectations of learning methods. Electronic Journal of e-learning, v.8, n.1, p.13-20, 2010.
MARTIN, F.; ERTZBERGER. J. Here and now mobile learning: An experimental study on the use of mobile technology. Computers & Education. v.68, October, p.76-85, 2013.
MARTIN-DORTA, N.,; SAORIN, J.; CONTERO, M. Web-based Spatial Training Using Handheld Touch Screen Devices. Educational Technology & Society, v.14, n.3, p.163–177, 2011.
MERHI, M. Factors influencing higher education students to adopt podcast: An empirical study. Computers & Education. v.83, April, p.32-43, 2015.
NICKERSON, R.; AUSTREICH, M.; ENG, J. Mobile Technology and Smartphone Apps: A Diffusion of Innovations Analysis. In: 20th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Savannah. Anais… Savannah, 2014.
NIELSEN HOLDING N. (BRASIL). Release – contato assessoria de imprensa. São Paulo. Agosto, 2014.
PÜSCHEL, J.; MAZZON, J.; HERNANDEZ, J. Mobile banking: proposition of an integrated adoption intention framework. International Journal of Bank Marketing, v.28, n.5, p.389-409, 2010.
ROGERS, E. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: The Free Press, 2003.
SHARPLES, M. The Design of Personal Mobile Technologies for Lifelong Learning. Computers & Education, v.34, n.3-4, p.177-193, 2000.
SHARPLES, M.; TAYLOR, J.; VAVOULA, G. A Theory of Learning for the Mobile Age. In R. Andrews and C. Haythornthwaite (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Elearning Research. London: Sage, pp. 221-47, 2007.
SHUIB, L.; SHAMSHIRBAND, S.; ISMAIL, M. A review of mobile pervasive learning: Applications and issues. Computers in Human Behavior, v.46, ed.C, p.239-244, 2015.
TRAXLER, J. Defining, Discussing, and Evaluating Mobile learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. v.8, n.2, 2007.
UNESCO. O Futuro da aprendizagem móvel: implicações para planejadores e gestores de políticas. Brasília: UNESCO, 64 p, 2014.
WENGROWICZ, N. Teachers pedagogical change mechanism – Pattern of structural relations between instructors’ pedagogical characteristics and instructors’ perceptions of transactional distance (TTD) in different teaching environments. Computers & Education, v.76, July, p.190-198, 2014.
WINTERS, N. What is mobile learning. In: Sharples, M. (ed.). Big issues in mobile learning. Report. University of Nottingham, 2007. Retrieved July 27, 2010 from <http://www.lsri.nottingham.ac.uk/Publications_PDFs/BIG_ISSUES_REPORT_PUBLISHED.pdf
WONG, L.; LOOI, C. What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers & Education, v.57, n.4, p.2364-2381, 2011.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Declaro que o presente artigo é original, não tendo sido submetido à publicação em qualquer outro periódico nacional ou internacional, quer seja em parte ou em sua totalidade.
- Declaro, ainda, que uma vez publicado na revista Pretexto, editada pela Universidade Fumec, o mesmo jamais será submetido por mim ou por qualquer um dos demais co-autores, caso haja, a qualquer outro periódico.
- Por meio deste instrumento, em meu nome e em nome dos demais co-autores, porventura existentes, cedo os direitos autorais do referido artigo à Universidade Fumec e declaro estar ciente de que a não observância deste compromisso submeterá o infrator a sanções e penas previstas na Lei de Proteção de Direitos Autorias (Nº9609, de 19/02/98).
A Revista Pretexto é licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivados 3.0 Brasil.
