LIDERANÇA SERVIDORA E ABUSIVA
REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA DA LITERATURA À LUZ DOS MÉTODOS BIBLIOMÉTRICOS
Palavras-chave:
Liderança servidora, Liderança abusiva, Bibliometria, Revisão Sistemática, Métodos BibliométricosResumo
O objetivo deste trabalho é realizar uma revisão sistemática da literatura das áreas de liderança servidora e abusiva, por meio da utilização de métodos e técnicas bibliométricas. Foi realizada uma análise de conteúdo dos artigos mais relavantes a partir do número de citações. Identificou-se crescimento na quantidade de publicações, sobretudo a partir de 2007. A análise metodológica demonstrou predominância de artigos que utilizam métodos quantitativos de análises. Quando examinados os artigos mais relevantes presentes no primeiro recorte temporal (considerando todos os anos), nota-se uma predominância de trabalhos de liderança abusiva a partir de uma visão que investiga a forma como os comportamentos abusivos se manifestavam e suas consequências institucionais e subjetivas. Já no segundo recorte observam-se trabalhos sobre liderança abusiva e servidora. Este trabalho apresenta contribuições para o enriquecimento de pesquisas dos modelos de liderança abusiva e servidora, por meio de uma revisão sistemática da literatura utilizando métodos bibliométricos.
Referências
Al-Hawari, M. A., Bani-Melhem, S., & Quratulain, S. (2020). Do frontline employees cope effectively with abusive supervision and customer incivility? Testing the effect of employee resilience. Journal of Business and Psychology, 35(2), 223-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10869-019-09621-2
Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L. Y., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: test of a trickle-down model. Journal of applied psychology, 92(1), 191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.191
Asrar-ul-Haq, M., & Anwar, S. (2018). The many faces of leadership: Proposing research agenda through a review of literature. Future Business Journal, 4(2), 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbj.2018.06.002
Ashforth, B. (1997). Petty tyranny in organizations: A preliminary examination of antecedents and consequences. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 14, 126 –140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.1997.tb00124.x
Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual review of psychology, 60, 421-449. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621
Avolio, B. J., Zhu, W., Koh, W., & Bhatia, P. (2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(8), 951–968. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.283
Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/135943299398410
Bass, B. M. (1997). Does the transactional–transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American Psychologist, 52(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.2.130
Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of applied psychology, 88(2), 207. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.207
Booth, J. E., Shantz, A., Glomb, T. M., Duffy, M. K., & Stillwell, E. E. (2020). Bad bosses and self-verification: The moderating role of core self-evaluations with trust in workplace management. Human Resource Management, 59(2), 135-152. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21982
Cahyono, E., Haryono, T., Haryanto, B., & Harsono, M. (2020). A New Insight in Relation between Abusive Supervision and Work Outcomes: A Conceptual Review. Quality-Access to Success, 21(177).
Campos, M. I. D., & Rueda, F. J. M. (2018). Evolução do construto liderança autêntica: uma revisão de literatura. Revista Psicologia Organizações e Trabalho, 18(1), 291-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.17652/rpot/2018.1.13473.
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1987). Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of management review, 12(4), 637-647. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1987.4306715
Day, D. V. (2000). Leadership development: A review in context. The leadership quarterly, 11(4), 581-613. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00061-8
Duffy, M. K., Ganster, D. C., & Pagon, M. (2002). Social undermining and social support in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 331–351. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069350
Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., Van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004
Gopakumar K.V. & Singh S. (2019). Can subordinate voice prevail with abusive supervision?: A conceptual model using conservation of resources perspective, Management Research Review, 43(7), pages 773-786, December.
Graham, J. W. (1991). Servant-leadership in organizations: Inspirational and moral. The leadership quarterly, 2(2), 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(91)90025-W
Harris, K. J., Harvey, P., Harris, R. B., & Cast, M. (2013). An investigation of abusive supervision, vicarious abusive supervision, and their joint impacts. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153(1), 38-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2012.703709
Hogg, M. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and social psychology review, 5(3), 184-200. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_1
Jabeen, R., & Rahim, N. (2021). Exploring the effects of despotic leadership on employee engagement, employee trust and task performance. Management Science Letters, 11(1), 223-232. 10.5267/j.msl.2020.8.012
Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: a qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of applied psychology, 87(4), 765. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.765
Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of applied psychology, 89(5), 755. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755
Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33(2004), 1-26.
Langhof, J. G., & Güldenberg, S. (2020). Servant leadership: A systematic literature review—Toward a model of antecedents and outcomes. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(1), 32-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002219869903
LeBlanc, M. M., & Barling, J. (2005). Understanding the Many Faces of Workplace Violence. In S. Fox & P. E. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (p. 41–63). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10893-002
Lee, A., Lyubovnikova, J., Tian, A. W., & Knight, C. (2020). Servant leadership: A meta-analytic examination of incremental contribution, moderation, and mediation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 93(1), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12265
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Liao, C., & Meuser, J. D. (2014). Servant leadership and serving culture: Influence on individual and unit performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1434-1452. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0034
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The leadership quarterly, 19(2), 161-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.01.006
Lord, R. G., Day, D. V., Zaccaro, S. J., Avolio, B. J., & Eagly, A. H. (2017). Leadership in applied psychology: Three waves of theory and research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 434. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000089
Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(6), 695–706. doi:10.1002/job.165
Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Authentic leadership development. Positive organizational scholarship, 241(258), 1-26.
Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., Brees, J. R., & Mackey, J. (2013). A review of abusive supervision research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(S1), S120-S137. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1888
McCune Stein, A., Bell, C. M., & Ai Min, Y. (2020). Does “the servant as leader” translate into Chinese? A cross-cultural meta-analysis of servant leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(3), 315-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1703681
Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of applied psychology, 92(4), 1159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1159
Owens, B. P., & Hekman, D. R. (2012). Modeling how to grow: An inductive examination of humble leader behaviors, contingencies, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 787-818.
Park, H., Hoobler, J. M., Wu, J., Liden, R. C., Hu, J., & Wilson, M. S. (2019). Abusive supervision and employee deviance: A multifoci justice perspective. Journal of business ethics, 158(4), 1113-1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3749-2
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual review of psychology, 63, 539-569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
Pradhan, S., & Jena, L. (2016). The moderating role of neutralizers on the relationship between abusive supervision and intention to quit: A proposed model. Journal of Human Values, 22(3), 238-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971685816650575
Prado, J. W., Castro Alcântara, V., Melo Carvalho, F., Vieira, K. C., Machado, L. K., & Tonelli, D. F. (2016). Multivariate analysis of credit risk and bankruptcy research data: a bibliometric study involving different knowledge fields (1968---2014). Scientometrics, 106(3), 1007-1029.
Puente-Palacios, K., & Côrtes, M. G. (2019). Evidencias de Validad de una Medida de Liderazgo Abusivo. Avaliação Psicológica, 18(3), 285-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.15689/ap.2019.1803.14989.08
Robinson, V. M., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational administration quarterly, 44(5), 635-674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509
Russell, R. F., & Stone, A. G. (2002). A review of servant leadership attributes : Developing a practical model. Leadership & organization development journal, 23(3), 145-157. http://doi.org/10.1108/01437730210424084]
Sahlmueller, B., Van Quaquebeke, N., Giessner, S. R., & van Knippenberg, D. (2022). Dual Leadership in the Matrix: Effects of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) and Dual-Leader Exchange (DLX) on Role Conflict and Dual Leadership Effectiveness. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 29(3), 270-288. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518221096547
Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S., & Peng, A. C. (2011). Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance. Journal of applied psychology, 96(4), 863. DOI: 10.1037/a0022625
Schyns, B., & Schilling, J. (2013). How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 138-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.09.001
Seidel, A., Saurin, T. A., Tortorella, G. L., & Marodin, G. A. (2019). How can general leadership theories help to expand the knowledge of lean leadership?. Production Planning & Control, 30(16), 1322-1336. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1612112
Spreitzer, G. M., & Cameron, K. S. (2012). A Path Forward. Oxford Handbooks Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734610.013.0079
Stodgill, R. M., & Coons, A. E. (1950). Leadership, membership and organization. New York: Prentice Hall. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0053857
Su, W., Lyu, B., Chen, H., & Zhang, Y. (2020). How does servant leadership influence employees’ service innovative behavior? The roles of intrinsic motivation and identification with the leader. Baltic Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-09-2019-0335
Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of management journal, 43(2), 178-190. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556375
Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of management, 33(3), 261-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300812
Tepper, B. J., Henle, C. A., Lambert, L. S., Giacalone, R. A., & Duffy, M. K. (2008). Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organization deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 721–732. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.721
Tepper, B. J., Moss, S. E., & Duffy, M. K. (2011). Predictors of abusive supervision: Supervisor perceptions of deep-level dissimilarity, relationship conflict, and subordinate performance. Academy of management journal, 54(2), 279-294. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263085
Van Dierendonck, D. (2011). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of management, 37(4), 1228-1261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310380462
Woods, T. B. (2019). An examination of the suitability of transactional, transformational and situational leadership theories in evaluating the role of gender in determining the leadership style: A comparison and contrast of three leadership theories. American Journal of Management Studies, 4(1), 1-11.
Yu, Y., Xu, S., Li, G., & Kong, H. (2020). A systematic review of research on abusive supervision in hospitality and tourism. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-12-2019-1004
Zellars, K. L., Tepper, B. J., & Duffy, M. K. (2002). Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of applied psychology, 87(6), 1068. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1068
Zhang, Y., Zheng, Y., Zhang, L., Xu, S., Liu, X., & Chen, W. (2019). A meta-analytic review of the consequences of servant leadership: The moderating roles of cultural factors. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9639-z
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Declaro que o presente artigo é original, não tendo sido submetido à publicação em qualquer outro periódico nacional ou internacional, quer seja em parte ou em sua totalidade.
- Declaro, ainda, que uma vez publicado na revista Pretexto, editada pela Universidade Fumec, o mesmo jamais será submetido por mim ou por qualquer um dos demais co-autores, caso haja, a qualquer outro periódico.
- Por meio deste instrumento, em meu nome e em nome dos demais co-autores, porventura existentes, cedo os direitos autorais do referido artigo à Universidade Fumec e declaro estar ciente de que a não observância deste compromisso submeterá o infrator a sanções e penas previstas na Lei de Proteção de Direitos Autorias (Nº9609, de 19/02/98).
A Revista Pretexto é licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivados 3.0 Brasil.
