PHILOSOPHY IN CIVIL PROCEDURE

DECONSTRUCTING THE REVERSIBILITY OF URGENT DECISIONS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46560/meritum.v19i2.9960

Abstract

The code of civil procedure requires the reversibility of the effects of urgent decisions. Doctrine and jurisprudence commonly distinguish urgent decisions based on their effects: reversible and irreversible. However, the article criticizes this classification. In a philosophy in Law, vectors of hermeneutic-philosophical rationality are brought to demonstrate, in the non-viability of the temporal return, that all the factual effects resulting from judicial tutelage are irrevocably irreversible, that any decision regarding emergency tutelage always ends up impacting the interests of parties. The legal text has its semantic potential, thus, redirected to

the fundamental pragmatism able to remove pseudo-covering foundations from the judicial arbitration. In other words, the writing intends to investigate the aspect of the decision-making grounds for urgent matters, in order to seek to refine the dialectical possibilities in the legal field, bringing a firm ground for the construction of the Law, especially regarding urgent matters.

Author Biography

HILBERT MAXIMILIANO AKIHITO OBARA, UNIVERSIDADE LA SALLE

Has a degree in Law from Londrina State University (1994), a master's degree in Law from Vale do Rio dos Sinos University (2003), a doctorate in Law from Vale do Rio dos Sinos University (2019), and a post-doctorate in Constitutional Law from the Federal University of Santa Catarina (2021). Currently acts as a  professor of undergraduate, master's and doctorate degrees in law at UNILASALLE and as a judge - in Rio Grande do Sul State Court. Serves as a magistrate since 1997, being currently head of the 5th Public Finance Court of Porto Alegre-RS. Has served as a judge in São José do Ouro district from 1997 to 1998, Cruz Alta district from 1998 to 2002, and Cachoeirinha district from 2002 to 2007. Has been summoned to the Court of Justice of the State of Rio Grande do Sul from 2015 to 2018 and served as a judge in replacement in several other courts and districts. Evaluator at FUMEC University, panelist at Fundação Escola Superior da Defensoria Pública Rio Grande do Sul, panelist at Escola Superior da Magistratura do Rio Grande do Sul and panelist at Fundação Escola Superior do Ministério Público do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Coordinator of the centers of study at the Superior School of Judiciary of Rio Grande do Sul and Coordinator of the philosophy nucleus of the Superior School of Judiciary of the State of Rio Grande do Sul. He has experience in the area of ??Law, academic and jurisdictional, with an emphasis on Constitutional Law, Civil Procedural Law, Philosophy of Law and Sociology of Law. Has published the book Reversibilidade das Tutelas de Urgência: A Ponta do Iceberg and five other collective legal works. He has also published several scientific articles in specialized legal journals.

Published

03/12/2025

Issue

Section

Article (s)